← Homemade Sovereignty
Homemade Sovereignty cover
Homemade Sovereignty · Episode 3 of 7 · 18 min

Printz v. United States: How a Narrow Constitutional Ruling Became a Blank Check for States

Printz v. United States (1997) held that Congress cannot force state sheriffs to run federal background checks. Over time, states of both parties used the anti-commandeering principle to refuse cooperation with federal law, from sanctuary cities to cannabis legalization to Second Amendment sanctuaries. The episode traces how a narrow ruling became a broad tool.

Who's who

Where it happens

Timeline

  1. 1993Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act passes
  2. June 1997Supreme Court decides Printz 5-4
  3. 2012Colorado and Washington voters legalize recreational marijuana
  4. 2016-2020Conservative states pass Second Amendment Sanctuary laws
  5. 2018Murphy v. NCAA extends the doctrine to state sports-betting deregulation

Still debated

Scholars debate whether sanctuary laws interfere with federal authority under the Supremacy Clause; lower courts have split and the Supreme Court has not resolved it. The Murphy v. NCAA extension was controversial, and the use of Spending Clause conditions is itself argued to be a form of coercion.

printzanti-commandeeringfederalismsanctuary lawscannabisgun policy
← PreviousThe Shire-Reeve Myth: How Modern Sheriffs Weaponize Medieval History

Connected episodes in other series