The most consequential civil-rights litigation of the nineteenth century was run out of San Francisco's Chinatown, and it is still holding the line. A community with no vote used the one branch that had to hear it: habeas petitions, Mamie Tape's school victory, Yick Wo v. Hopkins and a cook's son's 1898 case, Wong Kim Ark. In June 2026 the Supreme Court struck down an executive order ending birthright citizenship, resting on that case.
Who's who
Wong Kim ArkSan Francisco-born cook whose 1898 case defined birthright citizenship
Mamie TapeAmerican-born girl turned away from a San Francisco school in 1884
Yick WoLaundryman whose case invented equal protection as applied
1885Tape v. Hurley won, then separate Chinese schools authorized
May 1886Yick Wo v. Hopkins decided unanimously for the laundrymen
August 1895Wong Kim Ark denied landing and held aboard ship
March 1898United States v. Wong Kim Ark decided 6-2
January 2025Executive Order 14160 on birthright citizenship issued
June 2026Supreme Court strikes down the order in Trump v. Barbara
Still debated
The 2026 vote is characterized differently: five justices joined the constitutional opinion, one concurred on statutory grounds, and three dissented. Yick Wo may be the laundry's business name rather than the man's name.