← The Least Dangerous Branch?
The Least Dangerous Branch? cover
The Least Dangerous Branch? · Episode 1 of 13 · 42 min

The Supreme Court on Trial: Is It Really a Neutral Umpire?

The series opens with a physician's loss of faith in the Supreme Court after its 2000 ruling that the FDA could not regulate nicotine. That moment sets up the season's question: is the Court the neutral umpire of civics class, or a human institution shaped by politics and power? Two tests frame every era: did the Court follow the law or its politics, and who put these nine there.

Who's who

Timeline

  1. 1788Hamilton's Federalist No. 78 calls the judiciary the least dangerous branch.
  2. 1996FDA issues a rule asserting jurisdiction over cigarettes and smokeless tobacco.
  3. March 21, 2000Supreme Court rules 5-4 that the FDA lacked authority to regulate tobacco.
  4. 2005Roberts likens judges to umpires who call balls and strikes.
  5. 2009Congress gives the FDA the tobacco authority the Court said it lacked.

Still debated

Whether Brown & Williamson was faithful to what Congress enacted or a policy result dressed as statutory reading is disputed. So is whether following the law can ever be cleanly separated from following politics in hard cases.

supreme courtjudicial neutralitytobaccofdacivics

Connected episodes in other series