← The Politics of Intelligence
The Politics of Intelligence cover
The Politics of Intelligence · Episode 7 of 9 · 56 min

The Logical Error at the Heart of the Race-and-IQ Argument

The core rebuttal to the race-and-IQ argument is a point of logic. How heritable a trait is within a group says nothing about why two groups differ, as Richard Lewontin argued in 1970 with his seeds-in-soil example. The episode explains that gap and tests it against evidence including postwar German children, transracial adoption studies and the rise in IQ scores over the twentieth century.

Who's who

Where it happens

Timeline

  1. 1961Eyferth finds roughly equal scores among postwar German children of Black and white GIs
  2. March 1970Lewontin publishes 'Race and Intelligence'
  3. 1972DeFries proposes a between-group heritability formula
  4. 1976Scarr and Weinberg publish the first transracial adoption study
  5. 1984Flynn documents massive IQ gains across generations
  6. 2024PNAS paper generalizes Lewontin's argument and shows the DeFries formula fails

Still debated

Hereditarians have answered Lewontin seriously, citing the DeFries formula, attenuated adoption gains by adolescence, and selection among servicemen in Eyferth's study. Critics reply that key quantities cannot be estimated without environmental controls.

heritabilitylogiclewontinflynn effectadoption studiesiq
← PreviousThe Fabricated Twin Study Behind the Race-and-IQ Claim: Cyril Burt

Connected episodes in other series