← The Politics of Intelligence
The Politics of Intelligence cover
The Politics of Intelligence · Episode 6 of 9 · 49 min

The Fabricated Twin Study Behind the Race-and-IQ Claim: Cyril Burt

A central pillar of the race-and-IQ case, the claim that IQ is about 80 percent heritable, rested heavily on the separated-twin studies of Sir Cyril Burt. After his death, Leon Kamin noticed impossible consistency in the numbers and Oliver Gillie reported in 1976 that Burt's collaborators could not be found. The fraud verdict has been challenged, but the evidence behind the heritability claim was badly damaged.

Who's who

Where it happens

Timeline

  1. 1943Burt publishes first separated-twin paper, correlation 0.770
  2. 1966Third twin paper reports about fifty-three pairs, same correlation
  3. 1974Kamin publishes The Science and Politics of I.Q.
  4. October 24, 1976Gillie's Sunday Times article says crucial data was faked
  5. 1979Hearnshaw's biography concludes the twin scores were fabricated
  6. 1989Joynson's The Burt Affair challenges the fraud verdict

Still debated

Whether Burt committed outright fraud is not fully settled, since Joynson and Fletcher raised methodological objections. Even if Burt were cleared, that would not close the logical gap between within-group heritability and the causes of a group difference.

cyril burttwin studiesscientific fraudheritabilityiq
← PreviousWho Paid for Race Science? The Pioneer Fund

Connected episodes in other series