The finale asks what actually helps a forest and whether it is being done. Proponents point to prescribed and Indigenous cultural fire, cross-boundary stewardship, restoration funding, old-growth protection and assisted migration; critics point to the suppression legacy, weak biosecurity and sprawl. A sharp 2024 to 2026 policy swing gets both sides' best case, and the verdict is that the canary is neither dead nor fine, and the fight is over means, not ends.
Policy fights center on means, not ends. On the roadless rule, proponents of rescission say it blocks thinning and fire access, while critics say rescission opens protected forest to roads and logging.