The series ends with the modern ethics controversies and the live reform debate: 18-year term limits, court expansion, and ethics enforcement, plus the 'good Behaviour' snag and why reform stalls despite roughly 65% public support. It closes on the physician's nicotine story and argues for civic realism, reading the Court critically rather than cynically.
Whether 18-year term limits can be imposed by statute or need a constitutional amendment is unsettled. Observers also split on whether the self-policing ethics code is real reform, and whether court expansion would restore balance or spark an arms race.



