Between 1968 and 2020, filling Supreme Court seats became open political combat: a filibustered nominee, a rejected one, a blockaded seat, and two rule changes used by both parties. The episode catalogs the confirmation wars and the widely cited appointment gap between Republican and Democratic presidents, following the facts rather than a villain.
Who's who
Abe FortasJohnson's Chief Justice nominee, filibustered and withdrawn in 1968
October 1, 1968Cloture fails 45-43 on Fortas; nomination withdrawn.
October 23, 1987Senate rejects Bork, 42-58.
November 21, 2013Democrats end the filibuster for most nominations, excepting the Supreme Court.
February 13, 2016Scalia dies; McConnell says the seat should stay vacant until after the election.
April 6, 2017Republicans extend the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominees.
October 26, 2020Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed 52-48, producing a 6-3 majority.
Still debated
Each side names a different starting point for the escalation, from Fortas to Bork to Garland. Scholars also dispute whether the appointment gap reflects manipulation, luck or the ordinary reward of winning elections.