A generation-long study of about 8,000 people in six American towns proved that invisible fine particles in the air were shortening lives, and rewrote the Clean Air Act. The Harvard Six Cities study, published in 1993, became the standard example of value you cannot see, and later fights over its confidential data became the 'secret science' controversy.
The link between long-term fine-particle exposure and shorter life is among the most replicated findings in epidemiology, though debate continues over exposure estimates and biological mechanisms. The 'secret science' dispute pitted data access against participant confidentiality.