The strongest case against an informed electorate is strong: one vote rarely decides anything, party labels let uninformed voters vote like experts, identity outweighs information, and campaign persuasion averages near zero. The answer is narrower than information fixes democracy. Most of a California ballot has no cue, and that is where evidence finds a voter guide helps. The episode ends with a verdict on Elections Simplified and a five-step checklist.
The shark-attack finding about voter irrationality is itself disputed, and Lupia's study concerned ballot measures. The voter-guide study covered a single election, the Stanford study rests on self-report, and the League of Women Voters' stance on measures draws differing views.


