← No Fixed Address
No Fixed Address cover
No Fixed Address · Episode 5 of 11 · 18 min

The 72-Hour Hold: When Can the State Commit Someone?

In 1981 a San Jose psychiatric team asked a judge to keep holding a young man they thought could not survive alone; he said he would sleep under a freeway bridge, and the judge freed him. That exchange opens a tour of California's Lanterman-Petris-Short Act and the unresolved argument, reopened by SB 43 and CARE Court, over whether it protects or abandons people.

Who's who

Where it happens

Timeline

  1. 1967The Lanterman-Petris-Short Act is signed; it takes full effect July 1, 1972
  2. 2018-19SB 1045 and SB 40 create and revise a housing-conservatorship pilot
  3. 2022The CARE Act is signed; all 58 counties are operating by December 2024
  4. January 1, 2024SB 43 takes effect, broadening grave disability, with counties allowed to defer to 2026
  5. December 2025SB 27 is signed, strengthening and expanding the CARE Act

Still debated

The core disagreement is liberty versus care, and whether coerced treatment improves long-term outcomes is genuinely mixed. Critics say SB 43 expands who can be held without adding beds, and CARE Court uptake has run far below projections with a high dismissal rate.

involuntary commitment5150conservatorshipcare courtcivil liberties
← PreviousMental Illness, Addiction, and Homelessness: Cause or Consequence?

Connected episodes in other series