Trees trade carbon for water and mineral nutrients with mycorrhizal fungi, and a mapped network of Douglas firs is linked by Rhizopogon fungi. Then comes a twist: biological-market experiments suggest the fungi may be self-interested brokers rather than selfless couriers, so the proven biology is kept apart from the language of sharing.
Whether the mapped network actually benefits seedlings in the wild is disputed, as is whether mother trees favor kin. Researchers also debate whether the fungus or the tree drives the exchange, and whether words like sharing and communication help or mislead.