In 1990 a Republican president signed the law creating the first great cap-and-trade market, and acid rain fell faster and cheaper than predicted. The finale tests the economists' toolkit against every case in the series, from Pigouvian taxes to bans and standards. Pricing works where damages are diffuse and measurable and the polluter is findable, and fails where the science lags, politics reverses, or nature is the polluter.
The Acid Rain Program's cost savings range widely depending on the counterfactual, and benefit estimates rest on statistical-life valuations. Economists answer that bans and standards won for lead and fine particles because steep-damage cases are where theory favors quantity instruments; carbon border adjustments remain disputed as climate policy or protectionism.



